By Naturopath Gemma Hurditch, for CNM (College of Naturopathic Medicine). Do you eat soy? Drink it? Supplement with it? Are you concerned by the debate going on about the pros and cons of this now common legume?
In the West, soy is no longer just for vegetarians or the health conscious. Meat eaters are also getting a dose, albeit second hand, as in fact some 98% of soy protein meal is used as feed for livestock. The animals eaten are likely to have been subsisting on soy themselves! Soy has made it’s way into popularised ‘gluten-free’ products, and various health claims as to its prostate protecting, cardio-protective and hormone balancing see it an ever-increasing commodity in the shopping basket.
Data from the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, (2003) indicates that in most European and North American countries soy protein consumption is under1 gram (g) per day, however particular subgroups (vegans, vegetarians, and infants on soy-based formula for example) have higher rates of consumption. Many Asian countries consume much more soy protein per capita; most notably the Japanese at 8.7 g; Koreans, 6.2–9.6 g; and Indonesians, 7.4 g. It has been the notably reduced rates of reproductive cancers and osteoporosis in these countries that were originally hailed as evidence that soy properties (and in particular the hormone mimicking isoflavones in soy) are health promoting, anti-cancer agents. The increased incidence of other diseases such as cancers of the stomach, oesophagus and thyroid disease seem to be forgotten in this dialogue; the high salt content of many of the traditional Asian soy foods may be in part to blame for these increased cancer risks. There is much more to the soy story than just the marketing hype.
In Europe and America, there is an ever-increasing trend towards soy; as animal feed, as a replacement for other food stuffs and as a ‘bonus’ health ingredient, such as in bread. Soy can be eaten in whole food preparations; such as edamame (whole soy beans), miso, tofu, tempeh, nato and soy flour; this is way in which most traditional Asian diets include soy. Soy is also consumed particularly in the West in a highly processed form, soy protein isolate (SPI).
Many of the traditional soy products are fermented - a process which can reduce some of the undesirable qualities from the soy; lowering quantities of phytic acid (a potent mineral absorption blocker), as well as reducing enzymes that lead to trypsin inhibition (trypsin is an important digestive secretion).
SPI is a highly processed product and is the key ingredient in most soy foods that are designed for their palatability in the Western diet. SPI is used to imitate meat and dairy products. Textured vegetable protein (TVP), which is found in the ‘vegetarian option or low-cholesterol’ products (sausages/burgers etc) and sold on its own is also made from SPI. SPI is in soy baby formulas. The isolate is also utilised for various protein fortified foods, for supplements, and for protein and meal replacement shakes.
As SPI is not fermented, a number of other processing steps must be taken to remove the unwanted properties. The process is highly chemical - leeching aluminium into the product from processing vats, denaturing proteins in the heat treatment, and introducing the development of further unwanted chemicals such as the carcinogen lysinoalanine (in alkaline processing).
Since the 1970’s soy lecithin has been widely used in food manufacturing as an emulsifier, and sold in ‘health-food’ shops as a food supplement. The recent call for fewer trans fatty acids have seen a reduction in use of the partially hydrogenated soybean oil, however soy protein ingredients play functional roles in baked goods, processed meats and other products. Soy ingredients are also used to add nutrition to processed foods. If you are eating something packaged right now, please chance a look at the label!
On top of the concern that soy may not be entitled to its proclaimed status as a health food, the more sinister side to soy is the relationship between soy and disease. Soy is considered a goitrogen, and is thus linked to reduced thyroid function. Suspected health threats from soy intake range from the mild; hypothyroid patients may need to increase their thyroxine medication, to the extreme; soy causes thyroid disease, various cancers and serious hormonal issues in both male and female consumers.
In the USA and other major production countries, the vast majority of soy is genetically modified (GMO). In the EU, GMO products are required to be labelled as such (this is not a requirement in the US); but there is increasing concern that GMO contamination of non-GMO crops and the insidious infiltration of GMO (and other hazards) into the globalised food manufacture chain means that we are ever more likely to be eating foodstuff such as soy in a way not as nature intended. The safety of GMO produce is a long way from being confirmed, many scientists agreeing that is a dangerous gamble with unpredictable health consequences.
So should we be eating soy? A 2015 research project from the University of Illinois looks to have provided a key to unlocking the conflicting evidence. Researchers studying genes, soy and breast cancer found that the compounds in minimally processed soy flour stimulate genes that suppress cancer, whilst highly processed soy isoflavones stimulate oncogenes that promote tumor growth. Genistein, the controversial dominant isoflavone in soy, was equally present in both diets used in the animal experiment. The purified isoflavones also negatively affected immune function, whereas soy flour had a positive impact on immunity. This finding supports the hypothesis that it is the synergistic action of properties in whole soy that confer health benefits; whereas highly processed isoflavones have the potential to produce the opposite effect.
The message at this stage is what we will always fall back to - eat as close to nature as possible. GMO foods have no place at our table. Highly processed anything is unlikely to be health promoting. And if you couldn’t make it in your own kitchen, you probably shouldn’t be eating it! Moderate servings of traditionally prepared foods, provided you have good thyroid health and are not allergic (soy is a major allergen) may confer health benefits, but SPI is to be avoided.
About the Author
Gemma Hurditch is a Naturopath and a Bachelor of Health Science in Complementary Medicine. She works internationally for CNM (College of Naturopathic Medicine). CNM offers Diploma Courses, Short Courses and Postgraduate Courses in a range of natural therapies, all based on a naturopathic approach to health. The UK site is www.naturopathy-uk.com
No comments yet.